Home Cool Stuff Cool Tips Cool Talk Cool ChatNew organizers like PDA but better

by Xin Feng [10/09/03]

I never liked Palm and its alike PDAs or PocketPCs because for what people use them mostly for, organizers do them better and are much cheaper.  However, organizers were useless and vulnerable toys because they could not be synchronized with a PC (there were PCs back to then?).  What made Palm successful is exactly this synchronization feature (plus third-party software support).

There are three reasons why an organizer must have synchronization function:

  1. To be prepared for data loss.  Old organizers use battery to back up memory and data is easy to loose with a power/battery failure.  Organizers are easy to loose and drop off; you simply cannot leave all your important data in risk without a PC back up.  Without synchronization to your PC, you'll still have to write down everything on paper - then what's the point to use an electronic organizer?
  2. To be prepare to transfer your data to a new unit.  Organizer users are all gadget lovers and they tend to switch their gadgets very frequently.  If all the data you input into one unit cannot be transferred to another unit, you'll be screwed up when you must replace it later.  The most popular way to transfer data is to synchronize data from a old unit to Outlook and then synchronize from Outlook to the new unit.
  3. Data must be able to be edited on a PC.  It is always a pain to enter/edit data on a small device.  If things can be done on PC, people will more likely use it; or the unit will stay in dusts forever after initial passion.

Synchronization must be easy and convenient too; or people won't bother to do it and it is no better than without this function.  Palm did these very well; so people accepted it.  Old organizers all either lacked this function or did not do it right, until Sharp OZ-590.

The new Sharp OZ-590 organizer (above picture) can synchronize with a PC and Outlook as easy and fast as Palm does.  It is slim, light and its single AAA battery lasts forever.  Such characters are no longer found on PDAs.

bulletOnly $50.  For ordinary organization tasks, it does better than a Palm or PPC.  When you turn it on, it goes to the main menu page.  As long as you don't need to edit data, you can scroll to a function and browse your data with just one hand without having to pull out the stylus.  Any Palm or PPC can lunch an application and access it this way?  I know some Sony Clie models and the new Tungsten T | C and Treo 600 can lunch an application with a dial, but you cannot go any further with traditional apps because navigation buttons are not supported at Palm OS level.  There is no back or menu key though and Sharp really should have assigned these functions to the Prev and Next keys.  I suggest Sharp let the Prev key go back when it is at the beginning of entries and let the Next go to main menu when it is at the last entry (dear Sharp engineers, please consider this suggestion).  For now, if you want switch to a different function from current function, you have to turn it off and turn it on again to get to the menu page.  This is about one-hand operation; if you use the stylus, you can always tab a back icon that appears on every page.

bullet8MB flash memory. Far more than enough for all your possible data (address, notes, etc.) and no more data loss fear.
bulletAutomatic synchronization to Outlook.  All you need to do for a synchronization is to plug a tiny 2.5mm plug into OZ-590 and the sync program (running besides the clock area) takes care everything for you.  No button to press, no need to turn it on nor stupid questions to answer.  All my data in Treo 300 were transferred painlessly into OZ-590 through Outlook.

Sharp also provides you a desktop utility, which allows you to backup/restore data between PC and OZ-590 and import/export from/to Excel files.  Excellent!

bulletExpense tracking with customizable categories.  I don't want to talk about all the well known functions (phone book, calendar, schedule, to do list) except this one.  This feature actually allows you to record more than just ordinary expenses (meals, tolls, gas, etc.).  Better than earlier models, now you have customizable categories, in addition to payment options.  With customizable categories, this function is actually a very power full database (like Access) and spreadsheet (like Excel) and it allows you to record not just expenses but income as well or whatever you want to record.  With 8MB of storage, you do can record as much data as you want.  And you can always export data to Excel files and have more space for new data.  I find it is even more powerful than the one in my Treo 300 (Palm OS 3.5.2), which does not support categories at all.

For example, I have to record my car mileage for business usage.  I used to write mileage down on a paper notebook and year-end calculation was a pain (adding hundreds numbers).  I do not want to use a Palm or PPC for this neither because they are not reliable - too short battery life; whenever I need to use them, battery is low; and, data are gone when battery is empty.  With OZ-590, now I rename two expense categories as A1(for trip start mileage) and A2 (for trip end mileage).  I input mileage to A1 before I start my car and input mileage to A2 after I get home and turn off the engine.  OZ-590 can show me the total mileages (ΣA1  and ΣA2) for any given period and I can do a simple ΣA2-ΣA1 to get the total business mileage for tax return forms at year end.  As shown above, you can periodically back up or export the records to a Excel file to be safe (expenses are not synchronized to Outlook).

bulletLine separated memos/notes.  As I have so many notes for door-key codes, CD keys, passwords, etc. that I must take with me always, a good memo function is a must to me.  With OZ-590, I can create couple memo entries for "audio", "business", "codes", "computers", "keys", "passwords", etc.  OZ-590 recognizes line returns; so I can, for example, put passwords for different accounts in separate lines in the "passwords" memo.  When I need a password, I only need to scroll up and down in the "passwords" memo and find a password easy.  If I'm looking for a door-key code, then I only need to go into the "codes" memo.
bulletLike all other Sharp organizers, it has a backlit.  No problem to use it in dark.  Like watches, no problem to use it under direct sunlight either.

I cannot list all the cool points of OZ-590 here, but you can read the manual for details.

Some Other Organizers

bulletMy local CompUSA sells a PD-880 made by Columbia Telecommunications, which is a copy of OZ-590 with some enhancements.  Same price.  Same 8MB flash. It is milky white and half inch shorter.  It uses 2 AA batteries but still weighs exactly the same and it is even slimmer.  It has menu and back buttons (yes!).  When you turn it on, it goes to where you were (OZ-590 always goes to the main menu page).  Unlike OZ-590's very simple desktop utility, PD-880's desktop software is very much like the Palm Desktop.  Like Palm Desktop, you can edit all the records in this desktop application and then synchronize it to PD-880.  You can also download ebooks, TXT files and email messages to PD-880 and view them on PD-880.  You can import/export from/to Outlook and Outlook Express.  You can even draw memos with a stylus.  There's even a short cut button for quick access to four mostly used functions.

Sounds very good and has all what's missing in OZ-590?  The problem is, both hardware and software are buggy.  Use the desktop software to edit, import/export and synchronize is a real pain.  To do a synchronization, you plug the cable, turn the PD-880 on (have to), start sync on PD-880 side, must answer a nonsense Yes or No question "Do you really want to do synchronization now?" like you are using an ATM machine. Then hurry up to the PC side to get all the followings done before the unit times out: start the desktop program (it does not run in background), start synch there, have to answer some nonsense questions again, click a "Link" button in a popped up dialog box.  When sync process finally starts, it takes forever to finish.  Believe me, once you did this painful process once, you never want to do a sync again. It is pretty much like using an ATM machine but it is even slower and all the questions you must answer each time are totally unnecessary.  Dear designer: let people setup the options; it is a computer not a dummy ATM machine; you don't have to ask people the same questions repeatedly.  If you can address these little issues, it is absolutely a Sharp killer.

On comparison, all you need to do a sync with a OZ-590 is to plug the cable - you don't need to turn it on or press any button and you don't need to do anything on the PC side either.

Furthermore, when you add or edit a phone entry on PC, you must give a home number (why?).  Although you can import and export to Outlook and Outlook Express, but you cannot sync with them and sync is far more important.  This unit has exactly all the features I wanted from OZ-590, but when I use it more, I realize it is a crappy toy, not a serious business tool.  So, I returned it (even though CompUSA charged me 15% restocking fee) and kept the OZ-590.  BTW, PD-880 does not have a backlit.  This comes to the old design philosophy: a good unit is not about how many features it has; it is about how well it does for what it does.  If you are not capable to provide more, then don't.

I should also add that there seems to be no any customer support for this product as their website is almost empty.  I emailed to the email address found on their website but of course I receive no response.

bulletOfficeMax sells a Royal organizer that has both a stylus and a keyboard for $29.  This one seemed like my dreamed organizer - a full keyboard with a stylus as an option but not a must.  However, it is not that way.  With this Royal, you still have to use the stylus all the time and the keyboard always produces wrong keys.  Like all other Royal organizers, all memos/notes are stored and viewed in single line documents. For example, you cannot put passwords for different accounts in separate lines.  Piece of junk.  I really hate to pull out a stylus whenever I need to access my data and it is always a hassle decision for when to put the stylus back because I never know when I'm done with it.  I have no idea why stylus gets so popular and all manufacturers including Sharp must use it in new designs.
bulletAs all the new organizers use stylus, I have to look into the old models for a keyboard-type one.  I found the Sharp YO-480 is the best.  However, this model has two serious shortcomings: no categories for expense tracking and it uses a backup battery and all data will be lost if power is lost.
bulletThe new Palm Zire is as affordable for $70, but it uses fixed rechargeable battery.  If you like this type of battery, it is a better choice than OZ-590 because Palm OS allows run seamless applications. [01/01/04] PalmOne is selling the Treo 90 for $110.  Treo 90 is smaller than the Zire, but with a backlit keyboard, color screen and SDIO slot for adding memory, Bluetooth, WiFi or GPS.

Until someone comes out a new keyboard-type organizer like the small YO-480, OZ-590 is the best choice to me.  It is one-hand accessible as long as you don't need to edit data; its synchronization is very convenient; it has all the functions I need for every-day organizing and notes-taking; there is no risk of data loss with its 8MB flash memory; it is always available without daily battery charging; it is so slim and light that I can always carry it in my pocket.  Simply put: it is dependable and that's all about an organizer.

It was very sad to see expensive and crappy PDAs dominated the market in the last couple years.  Put high price aside, the initial PDAs were actually not bad organizers (using 2 AAA batteries for example).  However, things turned into wrong direction while competing with PPCs by adding more features (color screens and fast CPUs that eat up batteries for example).  Now PDAs have totally lost their roots: they still cannot do powerful things and they no longer do what they were good at neither (a programmable organizer).  Who can depend on an organizer that must be charged just at the time you do need it?  Only the Treo 300 (now Treo 600) went to the right direction and made a PDA, keyboard and cell phone comb done right.  You cannot imagine how hot the new Treo 600 is (just released yesterday and all stocked units were sold out in the first day).  If you do need more than just an organizer such as always-available Internet access, then Treo 600 is a very good choice.  If you do need a powerful pocket computer, give the new Samsung Nexi S160 a consideration and don't bother with all other PDAs and PPCs - they are either too small to be usable or too big to be pocketable.  This S160 has a 800x480 screen and a keyboard and it is still small and light enough to stay in a pocket.

It is good to see organizers still evolved and survived.  Just like more and more people realize radios are still more favorable than MD, CD, MP3, more and more people will go back to organizers after the PDA fuss.  Just take the good points from PDAs (easy sync and programmable etc.) and don't take the bad parts (the stylus, fixed battery, bulkiness etc.).  After so many years, Palm designers finally realized how awkward it is to force people to use a handheld with a stylus and they dropped that idea in the new Tungsten | C and Treo 600.  Ironically, now all organizer designers are picking up this thing.

Hopefully organizers will keep to be cheap, small, and battery friendly.

[11/03/03] I just realized that, other than using expense tracking, you can simply write records into notes. Just separate records with "," and then export the note to Excel.  Therefore, expense tracking is no longer a must-have function unless you must check total expenses on the organizer.

More Cool Tips Like This

Home ] Up ] FAQ ] Support ] Contact ] Links ] Search ] About ]

Copyright © 2005  Xin Feng Company
Last modified: September 10, 2007